Unit 1 of Transfer of Property (syllabus: Module I — meaning of property; movable and immovable; definitions; what may be transferred; competence; transfer for an unborn person; rule against perpetuity; vested and contingent interests; conditional transfers; election; apportionment; ostensible owner; feeding the grant by estoppel; lis pendens; fraudulent transfer; part performance; attestation). Below: what the unit covers, the provisions it turns on, and the cases an examiner expects you to name.
What this unit covers
- What is immovable property, when the Act only says what it is not?
- When is a right over another's land a profit a prendre, and why does it matter?
- When does machinery embedded in the earth become immovable property?
- When is a person fixed with notice of a fact he did not actually know?
- Can a transfer of a bare chance of succession ever be made good?
- When is a condition restraining alienation void, and when does it bind?
- How far may property be tied up for those not yet born?
- Is an interest vested or contingent, and how does a court decide?
- When must the owner of property elect between confirming a transfer and keeping his own?
- What is the effect of a transfer made while a suit about the property is pending?
- When does part performance protect a transferee who has no registered conveyance?
Treat that list as a self-test: recite each topic's rule from memory before you open its cases.
Provisions
- Transfer of Property Act 1882, s. 3
- Transfer of Property Act 1882, s. 43
- Transfer of Property Act 1882, s. 10
- Transfer of Property Act 1882, s. 13 and 14
- Transfer of Property Act 1882, s. 19 and 21
- Transfer of Property Act 1882, s. 35
- Transfer of Property Act 1882, s. 52
- Transfer of Property Act 1882, s. 53A
Leading cases
- Shantabai v State of Bombay
- State of Orissa v Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd.
- Duncans Industries Ltd. v State of U.P.
- Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation v Haji Abdul Gafur Haji Hussenbhai
- Jumma Masjid
- Rosher v Rosher
- No leading judgment is prescribed for this provision in this course.
- Rajesh Kanta Roy v Shanti Debi
- Supreme General Films Exchange Ltd. v Maharaja Sir Brijnath Singhji Deo
Full case summaries
- Duncans Industries Ltd. v State of U.P. (2000)
- Jumma Masjid, Mercara v Kodimaniandra Deviah (1962)
- Kartar Singh v Harbans Kaur (1994)
- Rosher v Rosher (1884)
- Muhammad Raza v Abbas Bandi Bibi (1932)
- Tulk v Moxhay (1848)
- Supreme General Films Exchange Ltd. v Maharaja Sir Brijnath Singhji Deo (1975)
- Govinda Pillai Gopala Pillai v Aiyyappan Krishnan (1957)
- Rajesh Kanta Roy v Shanti Debi (1957)
Exam questions on this unit
- Transfer of Property exam question: The Transfer of Property Act 1882…
- Transfer of Property exam question: It is said that section 43 of the…
- Transfer of Property exam question: Discuss the validity of…
- Transfer of Property exam question: Distinguish a vested interest…
- Transfer of Property exam question: Explain the doctrine of lis…