Examined on Hindu Succession Act 1956, as amended in 2005, Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act 1956; Guardians and Wards Act 1890, Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act 2015. The 2005 substitution of s. 6 is the law: a daughter is a coparcener by birth, with the same rights and liabilities as a son, and Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma (2020) settled that this does not depend on the father being alive on 9 September 2005. ss. 23 and 24 were omitted in 2005. Where this subject discusses the pre-2005 position it says so expressly, because the older scheme still governs successions that opened before that date.
This page is the map of the paper: every syllabus unit, the leading cases with full summaries, and the exam questions the paper actually sets.
Units
- Unit 1 · Family, Marriage and the Modern Statutes — Module I — the evolution of the family and of marriage; the Hindu Marriage Act after the 1976 amendments; the Special Marriage Act 1954; the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005; the Family Courts Act 1984; and the Benami Transactions legislation
- Unit 2 · Joint Family, Coparcenary, Karta and Partition — Module II — the Mitakshara joint family and coparcenary and their contrast with Dayabhaga; the karta, his powers and liabilities, and whether a woman may be karta; ancestral and separate property; alienation; and partition and reopening
- Unit 3 · Intestate Succession under the Hindu Succession Act — Module III — succession to the property of a male and of a female Hindu; the classes of heirs and the rules of distribution; disqualifications; and the effect of the 2005 substitution, taken from the sources that carry it
- Unit 4 · Adoption, Maintenance, Guardianship and the Uniform Civil Code — Module IV — adoption under Hindu law and under the Juvenile Justice Act; maintenance of wife, children and parents, including the Senior Citizens Act; minority and guardianship; and the Uniform Civil Code debate under Article 44
Leading cases in this paper
- Shayara Bano v Union of India (Supreme Court, 2017) — talaq-e-biddat set aside
- John Vallamattom v Union of India (Supreme Court, 2003) — section 118 of the Succession Act struck down
- C.N. Arunachala Mudaliar v. C.A. Muruganatha Mudaliar (1953) — Unit 2
- Hunooman Prasad Panday v. Mussumat Babooee Munraj Koonweree (1856) — Unit 2
- Sunil Kumar v. Ram Parkash (1988) — Unit 2
- Dev Kishan v. Ram Kishan (2002)
- Balmukand v. Kamla Wati (1964)
- Arshnoor Singh v. Harpal Kaur (2019)
- M/s. Nopany Investments (P) Ltd. v. Santokh Singh (HUF) (2007)
- Sujata Sharma v. Manu Gupta (2016) — Unit 2
- A. Raghavamma v. A. Chenchamma (1964) — Unit 2
- Kakumanu Pedasubhayya v. Kakumanu Akkamma (1958) — Unit 2
- Commissioner of Wealth Tax v. Chander Sen (1986) — Unit 3
- Gurupad Khandappa Magdum v. Hirabai Khandappa Magdum (1978) — Unit 2
- Uttam v. Saubhag Singh (2016) — Unit 3
- Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma (2020) — Unit 2
- V. Tulasamma v. Sesha Reddy (1977) — Unit 3
- Bhagat Ram v. Teja Singh (2002) — Unit 3
- Om Prakash v. Radha Charan (2009) — Unit 3
- Vellikannu v. R. Singaperumal (2005) — Unit 3
- Shastri Yagnapurushdasji v. Muldas Bhudardas Vaishya (1966) — Unit 1
- Dastane v. Dastane (1975) — Unit 1
- Bipinchandra v. Prabhavati — Unit 1
- Amarendra Mansingh v. Sanatan Singh — Unit 4
- Sawan Ram v. Kalawanti (1967) — Unit 4
- Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India (1995) — Unit 4
Exam questions
- Family Law II exam question: State the conditions of a valid… · 15 marks
- Family Law II exam question: Examine the grounds of divorce available… · 15 marks
- Family Law II exam question: Distinguish between void and voidable… · 10 marks
- Family Law II exam question: Discuss the sources of Hindu law,… · 10 marks
- Family Law II exam question: Discuss the position and powers of… · 15 marks
- Family Law II exam question: Explain the effect of the substitution… · 15 marks
- Family Law II exam question: Explain the doctrine of pious obligation… · 15 marks
- Family Law II exam question: What is partition under Mitakshara law?… · 10 marks
- Family Law II exam question: Explain the general rules of succession… · 15 marks
- Family Law II exam question: Discuss the scheme of succession to… · 15 marks
- Family Law II exam question: State the disqualifications from… · 10 marks
- Family Law II exam question: Compare the Mitakshara and Dayabhaga… · 10 marks
- Family Law II exam question: State the requisites of a valid… · 15 marks
- Family Law II exam question: Discuss the directive contained in… · 15 marks
- Family Law II exam question: Explain the right of a Hindu wife to… · 10 marks
- Family Law II exam question: Who are the natural guardians of a Hindu… · 10 marks