Examined on Interpretation of statutes — rules developed by the courts, General Clauses Act 1897, Constitution of India, Article 367. Most of this subject is judge-made: the literal, golden and mischief rules, the subsidiary rules of language, and the presumptions courts bring to every statute. Each rule is taught from the Indian and English decisions that state it.
This page is the map of the paper: every syllabus unit, the leading cases with full summaries, and the exam questions the paper actually sets.
Units
- Unit 1 · The Primary Rules: Literal, Golden and Mischief — The literal, golden and mischief rules, purposive construction, ut res magis valeat quam pereat, and how courts choose between the rules
- Unit 2 · Subsidiary Rules and Construction by Subject Matter — Noscitur a sociis, ejusdem generis and reddendo singula singulis; restrictive and beneficial construction; taxing, penal and welfare statutes; mandatory and directory provisions; substantive and procedural law
- Unit 3 · Presumptions in Statutory Interpretation — The presumptions a court brings to a statute — validity, territorial operation, jurisdiction, against inconvenience or absurdity, against intending injustice, and against impairing obligations or permitting advantage from one’s own wrong
- Unit 4 · The General Clauses Act, 1897 — The General Clauses Act 1897 and Article 367 of the Constitution — definitions, the effect of repeal, commencement, and the powers implied in a statutory power
Leading cases in this paper
- Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh (2013)
- Heydon's Case (1584) — Unit 1
- Jugalkishore v. Raw Cotton Co. (1955) — Unit 1
- R.M.D. Chamarbaugwalla v. Union of India (1957) — Unit 1
- Prafulla Kumar v. Bank of Commerce — Unit 1
- Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967) — Unit 1
- U.P. State Electricity Board v. Harishankar (1979) — Unit 2
- Koteshwar Vittal Kamat v. K. Rangappa Baliga (1969) — Unit 2
- The Empress Mills, Nagpur v. The Municipal Committee, Wardha (1958) — Unit 2
- All India Reporter Karamchari Sangh v. All India Reporter Ltd. (1988) — Unit 2
- The Remington Rand of India Ltd. v. The Workmen (1968) — Unit 2
- State of Orissa v M. A. Tulloch and Co. (1963) — Unit 1
- The State of Rajasthan v Shri G. Chawla and Dr. Pohumal (1958)
- Shrimati Hira Devi v. District Board, Shahjahanpur (1952)
- State of Bombay v. R.M.D. Chamarbaugwalla — Unit 3
- Dhulabhai v. State of M.P. — Unit 3
- All Saints High School, Hyderabad v. Government of Andhra Pradesh — Unit 3
- Union of India v. Filip Tiago De Gama of Vedem Vasco De Gama (1990) — Unit 1
- A.S. Sulochana v. C. Dharmalingam (1987) — Unit 2
- Jugmendar Das v. State (1951) — Unit 4
- Maheshwari Fish Seed Farm v. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board — Unit 4
- Maharaja Chintamani Saran Nath Shahdeo v. State of Bihar (1999) — Unit 2
- Commissioner of Income Tax v. Smt. Sodra Devi (1957) — Unit 1
- Garikapatti Veeraya (1957) — Unit 4
- A. V. Fernandez v. The State of Kerala (1957)
- Commissioner of Income Tax, Gujarat III, Ahmedabad v. Kurji Jinabhai Kotecha (1977)
- Commissioner of Income-Tax, Patiala v. M/s. Shahzada Nand & Sons (1966)
- Harshad Shantilal Mehta v. Custodian (1998)
- Indo International Industries v. Commissioner of Sales Tax, Uttar Pradesh (1981)
- Madanlal Fakirchand Dudhediya v. Shree Changdeo Sugar Mills Ltd. (1962)
- The Sirsilk Ltd. v. Government of Andhra Pradesh (1963)
- S. Narayanaswami v. G. Panneerselvam (1972)
- Kanai Lal Sur v. Paramnidhi Sadhukhan (1957)
- M. V. Joshi v. M. U. Shimpi (1961)
- Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Laxmi Narain Tandon (1975)
- M/s. Sainik Motors, Jodhpur v. The State of Rajasthan (1961)
- The Seksaria Cotton Mills Ltd. v. The State of Bombay (1953)
- State of West Bengal v. Washi Ahmed (1977) — Unit 1
- Chinubhai Haridas v. The State of Bombay (1959)
- Atma Ram Budhia v. State of Bihar (1952)
- B. N. Mutto v. T. K. Nandi (1978)
- Chandra Mohan v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1966)
- Lachhman Das v. State of Punjab (1962)
- Romesh Thappar v. The State of Madras (1950)
- Oswal Agro Mills Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise (1993)
Exam questions
- Interpretation exam question: The literal, golden and mischief rules… · 12 marks
- Interpretation exam question: Discuss the mischief rule with relevant… · 12 marks
- Interpretation exam question: A State legislature, acting on reports… · 6 marks
- Interpretation exam question: Write a short note on the golden rule… · 6 marks
- Interpretation exam question: Explain the maxims noscitur a sociis,… · 12 marks
- Interpretation exam question: "Penal and taxing statutes are… · 12 marks
- Interpretation exam question: A Central Act regulating charitable… · 6 marks
- Interpretation exam question: Write a short note on the… · 6 marks
- Interpretation exam question: Explain fully the presumption that a… · 12 marks
- Interpretation exam question: Explain any three of the following… · 12 marks
- Interpretation exam question: A Central Act granting a rehabilitation… · 6 marks
- Interpretation exam question: Write a short note on… · 6 marks
- Interpretation exam question: Discuss the effect of the repeal of a… · 12 marks
- Interpretation exam question: Explain the nature, object and scope… · 12 marks
- Interpretation exam question: A Central Act regulating cold-storage… · 6 marks
- Interpretation exam question: Write a short note… · 6 marks