Examined on Private international law — no single governing enactment, Rome Convention 1980 on the law applicable to contractual obligations, Code of Civil Procedure 1908, Heads the Indian material reaches only in part. India has no codified conflict of laws. The subject is built from the common law rules as the Indian courts have applied them, from the conflicts provisions scattered through Indian statutes — CPC s. 13 and s. 44A on foreign judgments, the Special Marriage Act, the Indian Succession Act — and from the international instruments below. That absence is itself examinable: say which rule you are applying and where it comes from.
This page is the map of the paper: every syllabus unit, the leading cases with full summaries, and the exam questions the paper actually sets.
Units
- Unit 1 · Introduction and Stages of Analysis in Private International Law — Module I — the nature and scope of private international law, its relation to public international law and to municipal law, and the stages of analysis: characterisation, the incidental question, renvoi, and the exclusion of foreign law
- Unit 2 · Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Foreign Judgments — Module II — the bases on which a court takes jurisdiction in a case with a foreign element, forum non conveniens and anti-suit injunctions, and the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments
- Unit 3 · Applicable Law — Family Matters — Module III — domicile and its kinds; marriage, its formal and essential validity, and polygamy; matrimonial causes and the recognition of foreign divorces; legitimacy and legitimation; adoption and guardianship; and the work of the Hague Conference
- Unit 4 · Applicable Law — Contracts and Commercial Matters — Module IV — the proper law of the contract and the party autonomy rule; the Rome Convention 1980 (the disk carries no Rome I Regulation); exchange contracts; torts; and the transfer of property, movable and immovable
Leading cases in this paper
- R. Vishwanathan v. Syed Abdul Wajid — Unit 1
- Y. Narasimha Rao v. Y. Venkatalakshmi — Unit 1
- De Nicols v. Curlier — Unit 1
- Forgo — Unit 1
- Re Annesley — Unit 1
- Sirdar Gurdyal Singh v. The Rajah of Faridkot — Unit 2
- Williams v. Jones (1845) — Unit 2
- Abouloff v. Oppenheimer — Unit 2
- Sankaran Govindan v. Lakshmi Bharathi — Unit 2
- Government of India v. Taylor — Unit 2
- Re Ross — Unit 1
- Collier v. Rivaz — Unit 1
- Huber v. Steiner — Unit 1
- De la Vega v. Vianna — Unit 1
- Leroux v. Brown — Unit 1
- Ogden v. Ogden — Unit 1
- The Christina — Unit 1
- Trendtex Trading Corporation v. Central Bank of Nigeria — Unit 1
- The Rose Mary — Unit 1
- Udny v. Udny — Unit 3
- Kedar Pandey — Unit 3
- Satya v. Teja Singh — Unit 1
- Parwatawwa v. Channawwa — Unit 3
- Surya Vadanan (2015) — Unit 3
- NTPC v. Singer Company — Unit 1
- Vita Food Products Inc. v. Unus Shipping Co. Ltd. — Unit 4
- Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. v. Harnam Singh — Unit 4
- Phillips v. Eyre (1870) — Unit 4
- Boys v. Chaplin — Unit 4
- Ohem Abheong v. Mahomed Rowther (1946) — Unit 2
- Kenya Airways v. Jinibai B. Keshwala (1998)
- Lalji Raja & Sons v. Hansraj Nathu Ram — Unit 2
- Maharani of Baroda v. Wildenstein — Unit 2
- Carvatho v. Hullblyth Angola — Unit 2
- Godard v. Gray — Unit 2
- Carl Zeiss v. Rayner & Keeler — Unit 2
- Carrick v. Hancock — Unit 2
- S.A. Consortium v. Sun and Sand — Unit 2
- Re Dulles' Settlements — Unit 2
- Emmanuel v. Symon
- Sadler v. Robins — Unit 2
- Vadala v. Lawes — Unit 2
- The Duchess of Kingston's Case — Unit 2
- Re Macartney — Unit 2
- Crawley v. Issacs — Unit 2
- Babu Nemi Chand v. Y.V. Rao
- D.T. Kaymer v. P. Viswanathan
- Mallappa Yellappa v. Raghavendra — Unit 2
- I&G Investment Trust v. Raja of Khalikote — Unit 2
- Marine Geotechniques v. Coastal Marine Construction & Engineering Ltd. — Unit 2
- R. Viswanathan v. Rukn-ul-Mulk Syed Abdul Majid — Unit 2
- Parkasho v. Singh — Unit 2
- Dynamit Actien Gesellschaft v. Rio Tinto Zinc — Unit 2
- Huntington v. Attrill — Unit 2
- Banco de Vizcaya v. Don Alfonso — Unit 2
- Whicker v. Hume — Unit 3
- Winans v. Attorney General
- Ramsay v. Liverpool Royal Infirmary — Unit 3
- Munro v. Munro — Unit 3
- Moorhouse v. Lord — Unit 3
- Aikman v. Aikman — Unit 3
- Doucet v. Geoghegan — Unit 3
- Puttick v. Attorney General
- Lord Advocate v. Jaffrey — Unit 3
- Attorney General for Alberta v. Cook
- Prem Pratap v. Jagat Pratap — Unit 3
- D.P. Joshi v. State of Madhya Pradesh — Unit 3
- Rashid Hasan Roomi v. Union of India — Unit 3
- Prakash v. Mst. Shahni — Unit 3
- Simonin v. Mallac — Unit 3
- Starkowski v. Attorney General — Unit 3
- Brook v. Brook — Unit 3
- Mette v. Mette (1859) — Unit 3
- Sottomayor v. De Barros (1879) — Unit 3
- Niboyet v. Niboyet — Unit 3
- Le Mesurier v. Le Mesurier — Unit 3
- Rosetta Evelyn Attaullah v. Justin Attaullah — Unit 3
- Joao Gloria Pires — Unit 3
- Neeraja Saraph v. Jayant V. Saraph — Unit 3
- Mira Devi — Unit 3
- Re Valentine's Settlement — Unit 3
- Travers v. Holley
- Re P — Unit 3
- McKee v. McKee — Unit 3
- Re R — Unit 1
- Marggarate Pulparampil — Unit 3
- British India Steam Navigation Co. v. Shanmugha Vilas Cashew Industries — Unit 4
- Tzortzis v. Monarch Line — Unit 4
- The Assunzione — Unit 4
- Amin Rasheed Shipping Corporation v. Kuwait Insurance Company — Unit 4
- Mount Albert Borough Council — Unit 4
- Bonython — Unit 4
- Ralli Bros. — Unit 4
- Cooper v. Cooper — Unit 4
- Male v. Roberts — Unit 4
- The Parouth — Unit 4
- Re Bonacina (1912) — Unit 4
- The Halley — Unit 4
- Machado v. Fontes — Unit 4
Exam questions
- Conflict of Laws exam question: Define private international law and… · 12 marks
- Conflict of Laws exam question: "Renvoi is a doctrine that promises… · 12 marks
- Conflict of Laws exam question: A and B, both resident abroad,… · 6 marks
- Conflict of Laws exam question: Write a note on connecting factors… · 6 marks
- Conflict of Laws exam question: Explain the basis on which a… · 12 marks
- Conflict of Laws exam question: Explain the grounds on which a… · 12 marks
- Conflict of Laws exam question: K, who lives and carries on… · 6 marks
- Conflict of Laws exam question: Write a note on the action in rem,… · 6 marks
- Conflict of Laws exam question: "No person shall be without a… · 12 marks
- Conflict of Laws exam question: Distinguish between the formal… · 12 marks
- Conflict of Laws exam question: A couple married in India and… · 6 marks
- Conflict of Laws exam question: Write a note on the recognition… · 6 marks
- Conflict of Laws exam question: What is meant by the proper law of… · 12 marks
- Conflict of Laws exam question: Explain the theories on the choice… · 12 marks
- Conflict of Laws exam question: A bill of exchange is drawn… · 6 marks
- Conflict of Laws exam question: Write a note on the effect… · 6 marks