India has no codified conflict of laws. The subject is built from the common law rules as the Indian courts have applied them, from the conflicts provisions scattered through Indian statutes — CPC s. 13 and s. 44A on foreign judgments, the Special Marriage Act, the Indian Succession Act — and from the international instruments below. That absence is itself examinable: say which rule you are applying and where it comes from.
The sections below are the ones the LL.B. papers examine on this Act, with the unit that covers each and the cases decided on it. The official text is on India Code ↗.
Sections in the syllabus
s. 1
s. 2(5)
s. 2(6)
s. 9(1)
s. 10
s. 13
- R. Vishwanathan v. Syed Abdul Wajid
- Y. Narasimha Rao v. Y. Venkatalakshmi
- Sirdar Gurdyal Singh v. The Rajah of Faridkot
- Williams v. Jones (1845)
- Sankaran Govindan v. Lakshmi Bharathi
- Satya v. Teja Singh
- Sadler v. Robins
- Re Macartney
- Babu Nemi Chand v. Y.V. Rao
- Mallappa Yellappa v. Raghavendra
- Marine Geotechniques v. Coastal Marine Construction & Engineering Ltd.
- R. Viswanathan v. Rukn-ul-Mulk Syed Abdul Majid
- Le Mesurier v. Le Mesurier
- Neeraja Saraph v. Jayant V. Saraph
s. 13(a)
s. 13(b)
s. 13(d)
s. 13(e)
s. 13(f)
s. 14
s. 15
s. 16
s. 20
s. 20(c)
s. 35
s. 36
s. 41
s. 43
s. 44
s. 44A
s. 44A(3)
s. 63
s. 65
s. 83
s. 86
s. 86(1)
s. 151
Cases on this Act
- R. Vishwanathan v. Syed Abdul Wajid
- Y. Narasimha Rao v. Y. Venkatalakshmi
- De Nicols v. Curlier
- Forgo
- Re Annesley
- Sirdar Gurdyal Singh v. The Rajah of Faridkot
- Williams v. Jones (1845)
- Abouloff v. Oppenheimer
- Sankaran Govindan v. Lakshmi Bharathi
- Government of India v. Taylor
- Re Ross
- Collier v. Rivaz
- Huber v. Steiner
- De la Vega v. Vianna
- Leroux v. Brown
- Ogden v. Ogden
- The Christina
- Trendtex Trading Corporation v. Central Bank of Nigeria
- The Rose Mary
- Udny v. Udny
- Kedar Pandey
- Satya v. Teja Singh
- Parwatawwa v. Channawwa
- Surya Vadanan (2015)
- NTPC v. Singer Company
- Vita Food Products Inc. v. Unus Shipping Co. Ltd.
- Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. v. Harnam Singh
- Phillips v. Eyre (1870)
- Boys v. Chaplin
- Ohem Abheong v. Mahomed Rowther (1946)
- Kenya Airways v. Jinibai B. Keshwala (1998)
- Lalji Raja & Sons v. Hansraj Nathu Ram
- Maharani of Baroda v. Wildenstein
- Carvatho v. Hullblyth Angola
- Godard v. Gray
- Carl Zeiss v. Rayner & Keeler
- Carrick v. Hancock
- S.A. Consortium v. Sun and Sand
- Re Dulles' Settlements
- Emmanuel v. Symon
- Sadler v. Robins
- Vadala v. Lawes
- The Duchess of Kingston's Case
- Re Macartney
- Crawley v. Issacs
- Babu Nemi Chand v. Y.V. Rao
- D.T. Kaymer v. P. Viswanathan
- Mallappa Yellappa v. Raghavendra
- I&G Investment Trust v. Raja of Khalikote
- Marine Geotechniques v. Coastal Marine Construction & Engineering Ltd.
- R. Viswanathan v. Rukn-ul-Mulk Syed Abdul Majid
- Parkasho v. Singh
- Dynamit Actien Gesellschaft v. Rio Tinto Zinc
- Huntington v. Attrill
- Banco de Vizcaya v. Don Alfonso
- Whicker v. Hume
- Winans v. Attorney General
- Ramsay v. Liverpool Royal Infirmary
- Munro v. Munro
- Moorhouse v. Lord
- Aikman v. Aikman
- Doucet v. Geoghegan
- Puttick v. Attorney General
- Lord Advocate v. Jaffrey
- Attorney General for Alberta v. Cook
- Prem Pratap v. Jagat Pratap
- D.P. Joshi v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- Rashid Hasan Roomi v. Union of India
- Prakash v. Mst. Shahni
- Simonin v. Mallac
- Starkowski v. Attorney General
- Brook v. Brook
- Mette v. Mette (1859)
- Sottomayor v. De Barros (1879)
- Niboyet v. Niboyet
- Le Mesurier v. Le Mesurier
- Rosetta Evelyn Attaullah v. Justin Attaullah
- Joao Gloria Pires
- Neeraja Saraph v. Jayant V. Saraph
- Mira Devi
- Re Valentine's Settlement
- Travers v. Holley
- Re P
- McKee v. McKee
- Re R
- Marggarate Pulparampil
- British India Steam Navigation Co. v. Shanmugha Vilas Cashew Industries
- Tzortzis v. Monarch Line
- The Assunzione
- Amin Rasheed Shipping Corporation v. Kuwait Insurance Company
- Mount Albert Borough Council
- Bonython
- Ralli Bros.
- Cooper v. Cooper
- Male v. Roberts
- The Parouth
- Re Bonacina (1912)
- The Halley
- Machado v. Fontes