Arts. 13, 14, 21, 32, 50, 226, 245, 246, 300, 311, 323A and 323B — the constitutional anchors of Indian administrative law.
The sections below are the ones the LL.B. papers examine on this Act, with the unit that covers each and the cases decided on it. The official text is on India Code ↗.
Sections in the syllabus
s. 1
s. 1(2)
- State of Bihar v Charusila Dasi (1959)
- Court on its own motion (Lajja Devi) v. State (2012)
- Pinninti Venkataramana v. State (1977)
- State of West Bengal v Anwar Ali Sarkar (Supreme Court, 1952) — the test of reasonable classification
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India (Supreme Court, 2017) — privacy is a fundamental right
s. 1, 246, 248
Covered in Unit 1 · Federalism and Centre-State Relations.
s. 2
- In re Delhi Laws Act (1951)
- Lachmi Narain v Union of India (1976)
- Indian Young Lawyers Association v State of Kerala (Supreme Court, 2018) — the Sabarimala case
- D.K. Yadav v J.M.A. Industries Ltd (1993)
- T.K. Rangarajan v Government of Tamil Nadu (2003)
- J.K. Industries Ltd v Chief Inspector of Factories and Boilers (1996)
- In re Berubari Union (Supreme Court, 1960) — the Preamble is a key, not a source of power; territory is ceded by amendment, not by an Article 3 law
- Bhikaji Narain Dhakras v State of Madhya Pradesh (Supreme Court, 1955) — the doctrine of eclipse
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India (Supreme Court, 2017) — privacy is a fundamental right
s. 2(1)(f)
s. 2, 3, 4
Covered in Unit 1 · Federalism and Centre-State Relations.
s. 2(6)
s. 2(31)
Covered in Unit 1 · Introduction and the constitutional framework.
s. 2(a)
s. 2(b)
s. 2(c)
s. 2(d)
s. 2(e)
s. 2(f)
s. 2(g)
s. 2(h)
s. 2(j)
s. 2(k)
s. 2(l)
s. 2(m)
s. 2(n)
s. 2(p)
s. 2(s)
s. 2(t)
s. 2(u)
s. 2(v)
s. 2(w)
s. 2(x)
s. 3
- State of M.P. v Thakur Bharat Singh (1967)
- Atlas Cycle Industries Ltd v State of Haryana (1979)
- A. K. Kraipak v Union of India (1969)
- Secretary General, Supreme Court of India v Subhash Chandra Agarwal (2010)
- Province of Bombay v Kusaldas S. Advani (1950)
- State of West Bengal v Anwar Ali Sarkar (Supreme Court, 1952) — the test of reasonable classification
- Bennett Coleman & Co. v Union of India (Supreme Court, 1972) — the newsprint policy and freedom of the press
- Bijoe Emmanuel v State of Kerala (Supreme Court, 1986) — the National Anthem case
- Indian Young Lawyers Association v State of Kerala (Supreme Court, 2018) — the Sabarimala case
- State of Bihar v Charusila Dasi (1959)
- K. C. Gajapati Narayan Deo v State of Orissa (1953)
- Union of India v H. S. Dhillon (1971)
- State of Karnataka v Union of India (1977)
- J.K. Industries Ltd v Chief Inspector of Factories and Boilers (1996)
- Court on its own motion (Lajja Devi) v. State (2012)
- Pinninti Venkataramana v. State (1977)
- Maneka Gandhi v Union of India (1978)
- In re Berubari Union (Supreme Court, 1960) — the Preamble is a key, not a source of power; territory is ceded by amendment, not by an Article 3 law
- S.R. Bommai v Union of India (Supreme Court, 1994) — the Preamble's strong Centre, the federal character, and the limits on President's rule
- Bhikaji Narain Dhakras v State of Madhya Pradesh (Supreme Court, 1955) — the doctrine of eclipse
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India (Supreme Court, 2017) — privacy is a fundamental right
s. 3(1)
- State of M.P. v Thakur Bharat Singh (1967)
- Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Ltd v State of Bihar (1983)
- State of Karnataka v Union of India (1977)
- S.R. Bommai v Union of India (Supreme Court, 1994) — the Preamble's strong Centre, the federal character, and the limits on President's rule
- Bhikaji Narain Dhakras v State of Madhya Pradesh (Supreme Court, 1955) — the doctrine of eclipse
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India (Supreme Court, 2017) — privacy is a fundamental right
s. 3(1)(b)
s. 3(1)(f)
s. 3(2)(c)
s. 3(2)(e)
s. 3(6)
s. 3(a)
s. 3(b)
s. 4
- Secretary General, Supreme Court of India v Subhash Chandra Agarwal (2010)
- State of West Bengal v Anwar Ali Sarkar (Supreme Court, 1952) — the test of reasonable classification
- K. C. Gajapati Narayan Deo v State of Orissa (1953)
- A. S. Krishna v State of Madras (1956)
- S. R. Bommai v Union of India (1994)
- J. B. Chopra and Others v Union of India and Others (1986)
- G. K. Krishnan etc. v The State of Tamil Nadu and Another etc. (1974)
- Githa Hariharan v. Reserve Bank of India (1999)
- Pinninti Venkataramana v. State (1977)
- Maneka Gandhi v Union of India (1978)
- In re Berubari Union (Supreme Court, 1960) — the Preamble is a key, not a source of power; territory is ceded by amendment, not by an Article 3 law
- S.R. Bommai v Union of India (Supreme Court, 1994) — the Preamble's strong Centre, the federal character, and the limits on President's rule
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India (Supreme Court, 2017) — privacy is a fundamental right
s. 4(1)
- A. S. Krishna v State of Madras (1956)
- Maneka Gandhi v Union of India (1978)
- S.R. Bommai v Union of India (Supreme Court, 1994) — the Preamble's strong Centre, the federal character, and the limits on President's rule
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India (Supreme Court, 2017) — privacy is a fundamental right
s. 4(1)(a)
s. 4(1)(k)
s. 4(2)
s. 4(2)(c)
s. 4(b)
s. 5
- Asif Hameed v State of J. & K. (1989)
- State of West Bengal v Anwar Ali Sarkar (Supreme Court, 1952) — the test of reasonable classification
- K. C. Gajapati Narayan Deo v State of Orissa (1953)
- Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Ltd v State of Bihar (1983)
- Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v Union of India (2015) — the NJAC case
- Court on its own motion (Lajja Devi) v. State (2012)
- Pinninti Venkataramana v. State (1977)
- Maneka Gandhi v Union of India (1978)
- S.R. Bommai v Union of India (Supreme Court, 1994) — the Preamble's strong Centre, the federal character, and the limits on President's rule
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India (Supreme Court, 2017) — privacy is a fundamental right
s. 5(1)
- Govindlal Chhaganlal Patel v Agricultural Produce Market Committee (1976)
- State of West Bengal v Anwar Ali Sarkar (Supreme Court, 1952) — the test of reasonable classification
- Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Ltd v State of Bihar (1983)
- Maneka Gandhi v Union of India (1978)
- S.R. Bommai v Union of India (Supreme Court, 1994) — the Preamble's strong Centre, the federal character, and the limits on President's rule
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India (Supreme Court, 2017) — privacy is a fundamental right
s. 5(2)
s. 5(3)
s. 5(6)
s. 6
- State of M.P. v Thakur Bharat Singh (1967)
- Krishna Kumar Singh v State of Bihar (2017)
- Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v Union of India (2015) — the NJAC case
- J.K. Industries Ltd v Chief Inspector of Factories and Boilers (1996)
- Githa Hariharan v. Reserve Bank of India (1999)
- Jagannathan Pillai v. Kunjithapadam Pillai (1987)
- Maneka Gandhi v Union of India (1978)
- State of West Bengal v Anwar Ali Sarkar (Supreme Court, 1952) — the test of reasonable classification
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India (Supreme Court, 2017) — privacy is a fundamental right
s. 6(1)
s. 6(2)
- Lachmi Narain v Union of India (1976)
- T.K. Rangarajan v Government of Tamil Nadu (2003)
- All India Bank Employees' Association v National Industrial Tribunal (1962)
- Maneka Gandhi v Union of India (1978)
- Bhikaji Narain Dhakras v State of Madhya Pradesh (Supreme Court, 1955) — the doctrine of eclipse
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India (Supreme Court, 2017) — privacy is a fundamental right
s. 6(5)
s. 6A
s. 6(a)
s. 7
- In re Delhi Laws Act (1951)
- Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v Union of India (2015) — the NJAC case
- T.K. Rangarajan v Government of Tamil Nadu (2003)
- J.K. Industries Ltd v Chief Inspector of Factories and Boilers (1996)
- S. Nagalingam v. Sivagami (2001)
- Maneka Gandhi v Union of India (1978)
- S.R. Bommai v Union of India (Supreme Court, 1994) — the Preamble's strong Centre, the federal character, and the limits on President's rule
- State of West Bengal v Anwar Ali Sarkar (Supreme Court, 1952) — the test of reasonable classification
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India (Supreme Court, 2017) — privacy is a fundamental right
s. 7(1)
s. 7(1)(b)
s. 7A
s. 8
- Secretary General, Supreme Court of India v Subhash Chandra Agarwal (2010)
- Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v Union of India (2015) — the NJAC case
- Seema v. Ashwani Kumar (2006)
- Maneka Gandhi v Union of India (1978)
- Bhikaji Narain Dhakras v State of Madhya Pradesh (Supreme Court, 1955) — the doctrine of eclipse
- State of West Bengal v Anwar Ali Sarkar (Supreme Court, 1952) — the test of reasonable classification
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India (Supreme Court, 2017) — privacy is a fundamental right
s. 8(1)
s. 8(1)(e)
s. 8(1)(j)
s. 8(2)
s. 8(2)(a)
s. 8(3)
s. 8(4)
s. 8(e)
s. 9
- Saroj Rani v. Sudarshan Kumar (1984)
- Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur (2017)
- Bhikaji Narain Dhakras v State of Madhya Pradesh (Supreme Court, 1955) — the doctrine of eclipse
- State of West Bengal v Anwar Ali Sarkar (Supreme Court, 1952) — the test of reasonable classification
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India (Supreme Court, 2017) — privacy is a fundamental right
s. 10
- Secretary General, Supreme Court of India v Subhash Chandra Agarwal (2010)
- Rohtas Industries Ltd v Rohtas Industries Staff Union (1976)
- Maneka Gandhi v Union of India (1978)
- S.R. Bommai v Union of India (Supreme Court, 1994) — the Preamble's strong Centre, the federal character, and the limits on President's rule
- State of West Bengal v Anwar Ali Sarkar (Supreme Court, 1952) — the test of reasonable classification
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India (Supreme Court, 2017) — privacy is a fundamental right
s. 10(3)
s. 10(3)(c)
s. 10(3)(e)
s. 10(5)
s. 10A
s. 11
- Maneka Gandhi v Union of India (1978)
- Pinninti Venkataramana v. State (1977)
- S.R. Bommai v Union of India (Supreme Court, 1994) — the Preamble's strong Centre, the federal character, and the limits on President's rule
- State of West Bengal v Anwar Ali Sarkar (Supreme Court, 1952) — the test of reasonable classification
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India (Supreme Court, 2017) — privacy is a fundamental right
s. 11(1)
s. 11(1)(a)
s. 11(2)
s. 11(5)
s. 11A
s. 12(1)(c)
s. 12, 226
Covered in Unit 3 · Tribunals, Discretion and the Liability of Government.
s. 12B
s. 12(f)
s. 13
- Sarla Mudgal, President, Kalyani v. Union of India (1995)
- Court on its own motion (Lajja Devi) v. State (2012)
- State of West Bengal v Anwar Ali Sarkar (Supreme Court, 1952) — the test of reasonable classification
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India (Supreme Court, 2017) — privacy is a fundamental right
s. 13(1)
s. 13(2)
s. 13(2), 19(1)(d), 352, 358
Covered in Unit 1 · Nature, the Rule of Law and the Separation of Powers.
s. 13, 13(3)(a)
Covered in Unit 1 · Nature, the Rule of Law and the Separation of Powers.
s. 13, 14, 21, 32, 226
Covered in Unit 1 · Nature, the Rule of Law and the Separation of Powers.
s. 13B
s. 13B(1)
s. 13B(2)
s. 14
Covered in Unit 3 · Tribunals, Discretion and the Liability of Government.
- Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Ltd v State of Bihar (1983)
- All India Bank Employees' Association v National Industrial Tribunal (1962)
- Jagannathan Pillai v. Kunjithapadam Pillai (1987)
- S.R. Bommai v Union of India (Supreme Court, 1994) — the Preamble's strong Centre, the federal character, and the limits on President's rule
- Pradeep Kumar Biswas v Indian Institute of Chemical Biology (Supreme Court, 2002) — the test for "other authorities" under Article 12
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India (Supreme Court, 2017) — privacy is a fundamental right
s. 14(1)
s. 14(2)
s. 14, 16
Covered in Unit 1 · Nature, the Rule of Law and the Separation of Powers.
s. 14, 19
Covered in Unit 3 · Tribunals, Discretion and the Liability of Government.
s. 14, 19(1)(g), 19(6)
Covered in Unit 3 · Tribunals, Discretion and the Liability of Government.
s. 14, 19, 21
Covered in Unit 2 · Delegated Legislation and Natural Justice.
s. 14, 21, 311
Covered in Unit 2 · Delegated Legislation and Natural Justice.
s. 14, 316
Covered in Unit 2 · Delegated Legislation and Natural Justice.
s. 14, 323B
Covered in Unit 3 · Tribunals, Discretion and the Liability of Government.
s. 14A
s. 15
- Keshavan Madhava Menon v State of Bombay (Supreme Court, 1951) — Article 13(1) is prospective
- Jagannathan Pillai v. Kunjithapadam Pillai (1987)
- State of West Bengal v Anwar Ali Sarkar (Supreme Court, 1952) — the test of reasonable classification
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India (Supreme Court, 2017) — privacy is a fundamental right
s. 15(1)
s. 16
- All India Bank Employees' Association v National Industrial Tribunal (1962)
- Rohtas Industries Ltd v Rohtas Industries Staff Union (1976)
- Pinninti Venkataramana v. State (1977)
- State of West Bengal v Anwar Ali Sarkar (Supreme Court, 1952) — the test of reasonable classification
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India (Supreme Court, 2017) — privacy is a fundamental right
s. 17
s. 18
- Keshavan Madhava Menon v State of Bombay (Supreme Court, 1951) — Article 13(1) is prospective
- All India Bank Employees' Association v National Industrial Tribunal (1962)
- Rohtas Industries Ltd v Rohtas Industries Staff Union (1976)
- Pinninti Venkataramana v. State (1977)
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India (Supreme Court, 2017) — privacy is a fundamental right
s. 18(1)
s. 19
- All India Bank Employees' Association v National Industrial Tribunal (1962)
- Maneka Gandhi v Union of India (1978)
- State of West Bengal v Anwar Ali Sarkar (Supreme Court, 1952) — the test of reasonable classification
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India (Supreme Court, 2017) — privacy is a fundamental right
s. 19(1)(c)
Covered in Unit 1 · Introduction and the constitutional framework.
s. 19(b)
s. 19(f)
s. 20
s. 21
Covered in Unit 1 · Introduction and the constitutional framework.
s. 21, 32, 48A and 51A(g)
Covered in Unit 1 · Foundations of Environmental Law.
s. 21, 47, 48A, 51A(g) and 253
Covered in Unit 2 · International Perspectives and Principles.
s. 21 and 14
Covered in Unit 2 · International Perspectives and Principles.
s. 22
s. 22(a)
s. 23
s. 23(1)(a)
s. 23(1)(s)
s. 23(2)
s. 23(2)(g)
s. 23(2)(h)
s. 23(2)(k)
s. 23(2)(n)
s. 23(2)(s)
s. 23(3)
s. 23(4)
s. 23(h)
s. 24
Covered in Unit 1 · Introduction and the constitutional framework.
s. 25
s. 25(3)
s. 25F
s. 26(1)
s. 27
s. 28
- L. Chandra Kumar v Union of India (1997)
- Secretary General, Supreme Court of India v Subhash Chandra Agarwal (2010)
- A. S. Krishna v State of Madras (1956)
- J. B. Chopra and Others v Union of India and Others (1986)
- D.K. Yadav v J.M.A. Industries Ltd (1993)
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India (Supreme Court, 2017) — privacy is a fundamental right
s. 28(1)
s. 28(2)
s. 28(3)
s. 28(4)
s. 28(5)
s. 29
- Dwarkanath, Hindu Undivided Family v Income-Tax Officer, Special Circle, Kanpur (1965)
- D.K. Yadav v J.M.A. Industries Ltd (1993)
- S.R. Bommai v Union of India (Supreme Court, 1994) — the Preamble's strong Centre, the federal character, and the limits on President's rule
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India (Supreme Court, 2017) — privacy is a fundamental right
s. 29(1)
s. 29(1)(a)
s. 29(2)
s. 29(3)
s. 29(4)
s. 30
s. 31(1)
Covered in Unit 2 · Delegated Legislation and Natural Justice.
s. 31(2)
s. 32
Covered in Unit 1 · Foundations of Environmental Law.
s. 32(1)
s. 32(1) and 32(2)
Covered in Unit 1 · Foundations of Environmental Law.
s. 32(2)
s. 32(3)
s. 32, 136, 226, 227, 323A(2)(d)
Covered in Unit 3 · Tribunals, Discretion and the Liability of Government.
s. 32, 226
Covered in Unit 3 · The Judiciary.
s. 33
- Dwarkanath, Hindu Undivided Family v Income-Tax Officer, Special Circle, Kanpur (1965)
- S.R. Bommai v Union of India (Supreme Court, 1994) — the Preamble's strong Centre, the federal character, and the limits on President's rule
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India (Supreme Court, 2017) — privacy is a fundamental right
s. 33(1)
s. 33(2)
s. 33A
s. 33A(2)
s. 34
s. 34(1)
s. 34A
s. 35
s. 35(1)
s. 35(2)
Covered in Unit 4 · Emergency, Amendment and Constitutional Bodies.
s. 35(3)
s. 35A
s. 36A
s. 36B
s. 37
s. 38
s. 38(1)
s. 38(g)
s. 39
s. 40
s. 41(2)
s. 42(1)
s. 42(2)
s. 42(5)
s. 42(7)
s. 42(8)
s. 43
s. 43(1)
s. 43A
s. 44
s. 44, read with Articles 14, 25 and 26
Covered in Unit 4 · Adoption, Maintenance, Guardianship and the Uniform Civil Code.
s. 45
s. 45Z
s. 46
s. 47
s. 47(1)
s. 48
s. 50
s. 50(2)
s. 50, 162, 246
Covered in Unit 1 · Nature, the Rule of Law and the Separation of Powers.
s. 51(4)
s. 52(3)
s. 53(1)
s. 53(1), 73, 154, 162, 202 to 204, 266(3)
Covered in Unit 1 · Nature, the Rule of Law and the Separation of Powers.
s. 54
s. 54(1)
s. 54(2)
s. 54(2)(a)
s. 54(2)(l)
s. 54(2)(m)
s. 55
s. 57
s. 57(1)
s. 58
s. 58(2)(b)
s. 58(3)
s. 59
s. 60
s. 62(1)
s. 62(2)
s. 62(3)
s. 62(6)
s. 63
s. 64
s. 66
s. 66(1)
s. 66A
s. 66C
s. 66D
s. 66E
s. 69A
s. 70
s. 72
s. 72A
s. 73
s. 74
s. 74, 77, 163, 166
Covered in Unit 2 · Legislature and Executive.
s. 75
s. 75, 164
Covered in Unit 2 · Legislature and Executive.
s. 76
s. 76(1)
s. 77
s. 77(1)
s. 77(3)
s. 79
s. 79(3)(b)
s. 80
s. 80(1)
s. 80(2)
s. 80(3)
s. 80(4)
s. 80(5)
s. 80(6)
s. 80(8)
s. 86(5)
s. 86(13)
s. 86(15)
s. 86(16)
s. 88
s. 90
s. 91
s. 92
s. 93
s. 99
s. 100
s. 101
s. 102(2), 191(2) and Tenth Schedule
Covered in Unit 2 · Legislature and Executive.
s. 104
s. 104(1)
s. 104(1)(b)
s. 104(1)(c)
s. 105, 194, 122, 212
Covered in Unit 2 · Legislature and Executive.
s. 106
s. 107
s. 107(1)
s. 108, 197
Covered in Unit 2 · Legislature and Executive.
s. 109, 110, 117, 198, 199
Covered in Unit 2 · Legislature and Executive.
s. 114(e)
s. 116
s. 116(2)
s. 118(d)
s. 120
s. 120B
s. 123
s. 123(3)
s. 123, 213
Covered in Unit 2 · Legislature and Executive.
s. 124
s. 124(2), 217(1), 222(1), 143(1)
Covered in Unit 3 · The Judiciary.
s. 124(4), 124(5), 218, 121, 211, 235
Covered in Unit 3 · The Judiciary.
s. 124, 125, 217, 218, 221, 121, 112, 113, 50
Covered in Unit 3 · The Judiciary.
s. 124A, 124B, 124C, 124, 217
Covered in Unit 3 · The Judiciary.
s. 125
s. 132, 133, 134, 134A, 136
Covered in Unit 3 · The Judiciary.
s. 139
s. 139(6)
s. 139A
s. 143
s. 144
- Commissioner of Police v Acharya Jagadishwarananda Avadhuta (Supreme Court, 2004) — the Ananda Marga Tandava case
- Sudeep Chaudhary v. Radha Chaudhary (1999)
- Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum (1985)
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India (Supreme Court, 2017) — privacy is a fundamental right
s. 147
s. 148
s. 148, 149, 150, 151, 316, 317, 319, 324
Covered in Unit 4 · Emergency, Amendment and Constitutional Bodies.
s. 149
s. 159
s. 163
Covered in Unit 2 · Legislature and Executive.
s. 164
s. 164(2)
s. 165
s. 165(1)
s. 166
s. 169
s. 174
s. 176(1)
s. 184
s. 185
s. 191(4)
s. 198(6)
s. 201
s. 226, 227
Covered in Unit 3 · Tribunals, Discretion and the Liability of Government.
s. 235
s. 237
s. 237(b)
s. 243B, 243D, 243E, 243G, 243K, 243Q, 243T, 243U, 243W
Covered in Unit 1 · Federalism and Centre-State Relations.
s. 243ZH, 243ZI, 243ZJ, 243ZK, 243ZL
Covered in Unit 4 · Emergency, Amendment and Constitutional Bodies.
s. 245
Covered in Unit 2 · Delegated Legislation and Natural Justice, Unit 1 · Federalism and Centre-State Relations.
s. 245, 246, 143
Covered in Unit 2 · Delegated Legislation and Natural Justice.
s. 246 and Seventh Schedule
Covered in Unit 1 · Federalism and Centre-State Relations.
s. 246 and Seventh Schedule List III Entry 42
Covered in Unit 1 · Federalism and Centre-State Relations.
s. 248 and Seventh Schedule List I Entry 97
Covered in Unit 1 · Federalism and Centre-State Relations.
s. 252 and 253
Covered in Unit 1 · Foundations of Environmental Law.
s. 254
Covered in Unit 1 · Federalism and Centre-State Relations, Unit 1 · Introduction and the constitutional framework.
s. 256, 257, 365
Covered in Unit 1 · Federalism and Centre-State Relations.
s. 265
Covered in Unit 3 · Financial Markets and Fiscal System.
s. 269
s. 280 and 281
Covered in Unit 3 · Financial Markets and Fiscal System.
s. 286
s. 290
s. 290A
s. 290B
s. 299
s. 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 307
Covered in Unit 4 · Emergency, Amendment and Constitutional Bodies.
s. 302
- S.R. Bommai v Union of India (Supreme Court, 1994) — the Preamble's strong Centre, the federal character, and the limits on President's rule
- State of West Bengal v Anwar Ali Sarkar (Supreme Court, 1952) — the test of reasonable classification
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India (Supreme Court, 2017) — privacy is a fundamental right
s. 303
s. 307
s. 323A, 323B, 226, 227, 32
Covered in Unit 3 · The Judiciary.
s. 323A, 323B, 226, 227, 136
Covered in Unit 3 · Tribunals, Discretion and the Liability of Government.
s. 326
s. 342
s. 354
s. 356(1), 163, 159
Covered in Unit 4 · Emergency, Amendment and Constitutional Bodies.
s. 356, 355, 365
Covered in Unit 4 · Emergency, Amendment and Constitutional Bodies.
s. 358, 359
Covered in Unit 4 · Emergency, Amendment and Constitutional Bodies.
s. 368
Covered in Unit 4 · Emergency, Amendment and Constitutional Bodies.
s. 378
s. 406
s. 435
s. 439
s. 491
s. 509
s. 549
s. 6256
s. Art. 5
Covered in Unit 1 · Philosophy, History, Preamble, Salient Features and Citizenship.
s. Art. 12
Covered in Unit 2 · Fundamental Rights I: State, Judicial Review, Equality, Freedoms, Life and Liberty.
s. Art. 13(1)
Covered in Unit 2 · Fundamental Rights I: State, Judicial Review, Equality, Freedoms, Life and Liberty.
s. Art. 13, with Art. 14
Covered in Unit 2 · Fundamental Rights I: State, Judicial Review, Equality, Freedoms, Life and Liberty.
s. Art. 14
Covered in Unit 2 · Fundamental Rights I: State, Judicial Review, Equality, Freedoms, Life and Liberty.
s. Art. 19(1), with Arts. 19(2) to 19(6)
Covered in Unit 2 · Fundamental Rights I: State, Judicial Review, Equality, Freedoms, Life and Liberty.
s. Art. 21
Covered in Unit 2 · Fundamental Rights I: State, Judicial Review, Equality, Freedoms, Life and Liberty.
s. Art. 21, read with Arts. 14 and 19
Covered in Unit 3 · Human Rights, the Indian Constitution and the Commissions.
s. Art. 23
Covered in Unit 3 · Fundamental Rights II: Exploitation, Religion, Minorities, Remedies and Savings.
s. Art. 25
Covered in Unit 3 · Fundamental Rights II: Exploitation, Religion, Minorities, Remedies and Savings.
s. Art. 30
Covered in Unit 3 · Fundamental Rights II: Exploitation, Religion, Minorities, Remedies and Savings.
s. Art. 31C
Covered in Unit 4 · Directive Principles, Fundamental Duties, the Judiciary and Other Provisions.
s. Art. 32(2), with Art. 226(1)
Covered in Unit 3 · Fundamental Rights II: Exploitation, Religion, Minorities, Remedies and Savings.
s. Art. 32, with Art. 226
Covered in Unit 3 · Fundamental Rights II: Exploitation, Religion, Minorities, Remedies and Savings.
s. Art. 37
Covered in Unit 4 · Directive Principles, Fundamental Duties, the Judiciary and Other Provisions.
s. Art. 51A
Covered in Unit 4 · Directive Principles, Fundamental Duties, the Judiciary and Other Provisions.
s. Art. 226(1), with Art. 12
Covered in Unit 4 · Writ Petitions and Public Interest Litigation.
s. Art. 227, with CPC O. XXXIX rr. 1 and 2
Covered in Unit 4 · Writ Petitions and Public Interest Litigation.
s. Art. 253, read with ICCPR Art. 11
Covered in Unit 3 · Human Rights, the Indian Constitution and the Commissions.
s. Article 13, read with Articles 32 and 226
Covered in Unit 3 · Organisation of Government — Separation of Powers, the Judiciary and Parliamentary Sovereignty.
s. Article 14
Covered in Unit 3 · Presumptions in Statutory Interpretation.
s. Article 14 and Article 15(1)
Covered in Unit 2 · Political Obligation — State Authority and the Citizen.
s. Article 14, read with Articles 21, 32 and 226
Covered in Unit 3 · Organisation of Government — Separation of Powers, the Judiciary and Parliamentary Sovereignty.
s. Article 15(3)
Covered in Unit 1 · Women, the Constitution and International Instruments.
s. Article 19(1) and Article 19(2)
Covered in Unit 3 · Political Ideologies.
s. Article 20(1)
Covered in Unit 2 · Subsidiary Rules and Construction by Subject Matter.
s. Article 21
Covered in Unit 1 · Right to Health and the Medical Profession.
s. Article 21, with Articles 39(e), 41, 42, 47 and 48A
Covered in Unit 1 · Right to Health and the Medical Profession.
s. Article 23
Covered in Unit 4 · Correction of Offenders, Probation, Parole and Victimology.
s. Article 24
Covered in Unit 3 · The Social, Constitutional and International Status of the Child.
s. Article 32 read with Article 142
Covered in Unit 3 · The Police, Penology and the Theories of Punishment.
s. Article 40
Covered in Unit 4 · Indian Democracy at Work.
s. Article 50, with articles 233 and 235
Covered in Unit 3 · Courts under the Constitution; Rule of Law, Independence of the Judiciary and Separation of Powers.
s. Article 124
Covered in Unit 3 · Courts under the Constitution; Rule of Law, Independence of the Judiciary and Separation of Powers.
s. Article 124(2) and article 124A
Covered in Unit 3 · Courts under the Constitution; Rule of Law, Independence of the Judiciary and Separation of Powers.
s. Article 141
Covered in Unit 1 · Law, Sources, Legal Language and Analysis.
s. Article 245
Covered in Unit 3 · Presumptions in Statutory Interpretation.
s. Article 265
Covered in Unit 2 · Subsidiary Rules and Construction by Subject Matter, Unit 1 · Foundations of Indian Tax Law.
s. Article 368, read with Article 13
Covered in Unit 3 · Organisation of Government — Separation of Powers, the Judiciary and Parliamentary Sovereignty.
s. Articles 13, 32, 144 and 226
Covered in Unit 3 · Courts under the Constitution; Rule of Law, Independence of the Judiciary and Separation of Powers.
s. Articles 13, 246, 249 and 368
Covered in Unit 3 · Organisation of Government — Separation of Powers, the Judiciary and Parliamentary Sovereignty.
s. Articles 14, 19(1)(a) and 19(2)
Covered in Unit 4 · Technology, Social Media and the Law.
s. Articles 15(3), 23, 28, 29 and 39(e) and (f)
Covered in Unit 3 · The Social, Constitutional and International Status of the Child.
s. Articles 15, 16, 37, 44, 46 and 335
Covered in Unit 3 · Selected Readings, Moots and Constitutional Provisions.
s. Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(2)
Covered in Unit 4 · Technology, Social Media and the Law.
s. Articles 21A, 45 and 51A(k)
Covered in Unit 3 · The Social, Constitutional and International Status of the Child.
s. Articles 21 and 22(1)
Covered in Unit 3 · The Police, Penology and the Theories of Punishment.
s. Articles 31A and 31B, with Articles 38 and 39
Covered in Unit 4 · Partition and Post-Independence India.
s. Articles 32, 124, 125, 131, 136, 141 and 226
Covered in Unit 3 · Organisation of Government — Separation of Powers, the Judiciary and Parliamentary Sovereignty.
s. Articles 32, 142, 161 and 226
Covered in Unit 2 · Legal Concepts, Reading Judgments and Trials.
s. Articles 32 and 226
Covered in Unit 4 · Legal Writing, PIL Research, Technology and the Law Office, Unit 3 · Courts under the Constitution; Rule of Law, Independence of the Judiciary and Separation of Powers, Unit 4 · Legal Writing, PIL Research, Technology and the Law Office.
s. Articles 39, 42 and 51A(e)
Covered in Unit 1 · Women, the Constitution and International Instruments.
s. Articles 50, 123, 233, 235 and 368
Covered in Unit 3 · Organisation of Government — Separation of Powers, the Judiciary and Parliamentary Sovereignty.
s. Articles 121, 124, 125, 129, 146, 211, 215 and 235
Covered in Unit 3 · Courts under the Constitution; Rule of Law, Independence of the Judiciary and Separation of Powers.
s. Articles 129 to 136, 141 to 144 and 32
Covered in Unit 3 · Courts under the Constitution; Rule of Law, Independence of the Judiciary and Separation of Powers.
s. Articles 243D, 243T, 325, 326, 330A, 332A and 334A
Covered in Unit 4 · Representation.
s. Articles 243D and 243T
Covered in Unit 1 · Women, the Constitution and International Instruments.
s. Articles 245 and 246 with the Seventh Schedule
Covered in Unit 1 · The Primary Rules: Literal, Golden and Mischief.
s. Articles 246, 246A, 248 and the Seventh Schedule
Covered in Unit 1 · Foundations of Indian Tax Law.
s. Articles 246, 249, 257, 356 and the Seventh Schedule
Covered in Unit 2 · Government as a Concept in Political Theory.
s. Articles 246A, 269A and 279A
Covered in Unit 4 · GST and Maharashtra Profession Tax.
s. Articles 324, 327, 328 and 329
Covered in Unit 4 · Representation.
s. Articles 325, 330, 331, 332 and 334
Covered in Unit 4 · Representation.
s. Articles 325 and 326
Covered in Unit 4 · Representation.
s. Articles 325 and 327
Covered in Unit 4 · Representation.
s. Arts. 14, 15(3), 15(4), 16(4) and 17
Covered in Unit 4 · Vulnerable Groups and Regional Arrangements.
s. Arts. 14, 15, 19(1)(g), 21 and 51
Covered in Unit 3 · Human Rights, the Indian Constitution and the Commissions.
s. Arts. 21, 22(5) and 32
Covered in Unit 4 · Writ Petitions and Public Interest Litigation.
s. Arts. 21, 32, 142 and 226, read with ICCPR Art. 9(5)
Covered in Unit 3 · Human Rights, the Indian Constitution and the Commissions.
s. Arts. 32(2) and 226(1)
Covered in Unit 4 · Writ Petitions and Public Interest Litigation.
s. Arts. 32, 37 and 51A
Covered in Unit 3 · Human Rights, the Indian Constitution and the Commissions.
s. Arts. 32, 51 and 226
Covered in Unit 3 · Human Rights, the Indian Constitution and the Commissions.
s. Arts. 32, 226 and 227
Covered in Unit 4 · Writ Petitions and Public Interest Litigation.
s. Arts. 32 and 226
Covered in Unit 4 · Writ Petitions and Public Interest Litigation.
s. Arts. 129, 215, 142(2) and 19(1)(a) with 19(2)
Covered in Unit 4 · Contempt, Bar–Bench relations and accountancy for lawyers.
s. Part III with Part IV
Covered in Unit 4 · Directive Principles, Fundamental Duties, the Judiciary and Other Provisions.
s. Part IX and Part IXA; Articles 243D, 243G and 243K
Covered in Unit 4 · Indian Democracy at Work.
s. Preamble
Covered in Unit 1 · Philosophy, History, Preamble, Salient Features and Citizenship.
s. Preamble, Article 38 and Article 39(b) and (c)
Covered in Unit 3 · Political Ideologies.
s. Preamble, with Art. 356
Covered in Unit 1 · Philosophy, History, Preamble, Salient Features and Citizenship.
s. Preamble, with Art. 368
Covered in Unit 1 · Philosophy, History, Preamble, Salient Features and Citizenship.
s. Proviso to Article 304
Covered in Unit 2 · Subsidiary Rules and Construction by Subject Matter.
s. Seventh Schedule, List I entry 45 and List II entry 32
Covered in Unit 1 · Banking Structure and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
s. Seventh Schedule, List III, entry 9
Covered in Unit 1 · Foundations of the Code.
Cases on this Act
- Rai Sahib Ram Jawaya Kapur v State of Punjab (1955)
- Asif Hameed v State of J. & K. (1989)
- State of M.P. v Thakur Bharat Singh (1967)
- In re Delhi Laws Act (1951)
- Rajnarain Singh v Chairman, Patna Administration Committee (1954)
- Lachmi Narain v Union of India (1976)
- Atlas Cycle Industries Ltd v State of Haryana (1979)
- Govindlal Chhaganlal Patel v Agricultural Produce Market Committee (1976)
- A. K. Kraipak v Union of India (1969)
- Ashok Kumar Yadav v State of Haryana (1985)
- Trop v. Dulles (1958)
- Maneka Gandhi v Union of India (1978)
- S. N. Mukherjee v Union of India (1990)
- Managing Director, ECIL, Hyderabad v B. Karunakar (1993)
- Dwarka Prasad Laxmi Narain v State of U.P. (1954)
- Om Kumar v Union of India (2000)
- Syed Yakoob v K. S. Radhakrishnan (1964)
- Anadi Mukta Sadguru Trust v V. R. Rudani (1989)
- L. Chandra Kumar v Union of India (1997)
- Union of India v R. Gandhi, President, Madras Bar Association (2010)
- Secretary General, Supreme Court of India v Subhash Chandra Agarwal (2010)
- Ridge v Baldwin (1963)
- Som Datt Datta v Union of India (1969)
- Province of Bombay v Kusaldas S. Advani (1950)
- Dwarkanath, Hindu Undivided Family v Income-Tax Officer, Special Circle, Kanpur (1965)
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Daly (2001)
- Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886)
- Kesavananda Bharati v State of Kerala (Supreme Court, 1973) — Parliament may amend any provision, but not the basic structure
- In re Berubari Union (Supreme Court, 1960) — the Preamble is a key, not a source of power; territory is ceded by amendment, not by an Article 3 law
- S.R. Bommai v Union of India (Supreme Court, 1994) — the Preamble's strong Centre, the federal character, and the limits on President's rule
- Pradeep Kumar Biswas v Indian Institute of Chemical Biology (Supreme Court, 2002) — the test for "other authorities" under Article 12
- Keshavan Madhava Menon v State of Bombay (Supreme Court, 1951) — Article 13(1) is prospective
- Bhikaji Narain Dhakras v State of Madhya Pradesh (Supreme Court, 1955) — the doctrine of eclipse
- State of West Bengal v Anwar Ali Sarkar (Supreme Court, 1952) — the test of reasonable classification
- E.P. Royappa v State of Tamil Nadu (Supreme Court, 1973) — equality as a guarantee against arbitrariness
- Indra Sawhney v Union of India (Supreme Court, 1992) — the Mandal Commission case
- M. Nagaraj v Union of India (2006) and Jarnail Singh v Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2018) — reservation in promotion after Indra Sawhney
- Bennett Coleman & Co. v Union of India (Supreme Court, 1972) — the newsprint policy and freedom of the press
- Shreya Singhal v Union of India (Supreme Court, 2015) — section 66A and speech on the internet
- Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v Union of India (Supreme Court, 2017) — privacy is a fundamental right
- D.K. Basu v State of West Bengal (Supreme Court, 1997) — the eleven requirements on arrest and custody
- Chintaman Rao v State of Madhya Pradesh (Supreme Court, 1950) — what makes a restriction "reasonable"
- Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowments, Madras v Sri Lakshmindra Thirtha Swamiar of Sri Shirur Mutt (Supreme Court, 1954) — what "religion" protects
- Rev. Stainislaus v State of Madhya Pradesh (Supreme Court, 1977) — the right to propagate is not a right to convert
- Bijoe Emmanuel v State of Kerala (Supreme Court, 1986) — the National Anthem case
- Sukhdev Singh v Bhagatram Sardar Singh Raghuvanshi (1975)
- Seshammal v State of Tamil Nadu (Supreme Court, 1972) — the archaka's appointment is secular
- N. Adithayan v Travancore Devaswom Board (Supreme Court, 2002) — caste is no qualification for the priesthood
- Commissioner of Police v Acharya Jagadishwarananda Avadhuta (Supreme Court, 2004) — the Ananda Marga Tandava case
- Indian Young Lawyers Association v State of Kerala (Supreme Court, 2018) — the Sabarimala case
- T.M.A. Pai Foundation v State of Karnataka (Supreme Court, 2002) — eleven judges on minority institutions
- Islamic Academy of Education v State of Karnataka (2003) and P.A. Inamdar v State of Maharashtra (2005) — after T.M.A. Pai
- S.P. Gupta v Union of India (Supreme Court, 1981) — the Judges' Transfer case and the birth of public interest litigation
- Nilabati Behera v State of Orissa (Supreme Court, 1993) — compensation as a public-law remedy
- State of Uttaranchal v Balwant Singh Chaufal (Supreme Court, 2010) — the three phases of public interest litigation and the directions against its abuse
- Bandhua Mukti Morcha v Union of India (Supreme Court, 1983) — bonded labour, the letter petition and the presumption
- Rudul Sah v State of Bihar (Supreme Court, 1983) — compensation in a habeas corpus petition
- State of West Bengal v Union of India (1963)
- In re Berubari Union and Exchange of Enclaves (1960)
- Prafulla Kumar Mukherjee v Bank of Commerce Ltd, Khulna (1947)
- State of Bihar v Charusila Dasi (1959)
- K. C. Gajapati Narayan Deo v State of Orissa (1953)
- Union of India v H. S. Dhillon (1971)
- Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Ltd v State of Bihar (1983)
- Samsher Singh v State of Punjab (1974)
- Raja Ram Pal v Hon'ble Speaker, Lok Sabha (2007)
- B. R. Kapur v State of Tamil Nadu (2001)
- S. Kodar v State of Kerala (1974)
- A. S. Krishna v State of Madras (1956)
- Krishna Kumar Singh v State of Bihar (2017)
- S. P. Gupta v Union of India (1981)
- In re Special Reference No. 1 of 1998 — the Third Judges case
- Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v Union of India (2015) — the NJAC case
- S. R. Bommai v Union of India (1994)
- Jindal Stainless Ltd v State of Haryana (2017)
- Rameshwar Prasad v Union of India (2006)
- Government of NCT of Delhi v Union of India and Another (2018)
- State of Karnataka v Union of India (1977)
- State of Rajasthan v Union of India (1977)
- J. B. Chopra and Others v Union of India and Others (1986)
- G. K. Krishnan etc. v The State of Tamil Nadu and Another etc. (1974)
- I.R. Coelho (Dead) by LRs v State of Tamil Nadu and Others (2007)
- Kamaluddin's Case (1775)
- The Patna Case (1777)
- Cossijurah's Case (1779)
- Trial of Raja Nandakumar (1775)
- Saroop Chand's Case
- Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association and another v. Union of India (2015)
- Gross negligence as professional misconduct (AIR 1965 Mys 28)
- Terrorising a client as professional misconduct (Punjab case, 65 L.J. 619)
- Excel Wear v Union of India (1979)
- D.K. Yadav v J.M.A. Industries Ltd (1993)
- T.K. Rangarajan v Government of Tamil Nadu (2003)
- All India Bank Employees' Association v National Industrial Tribunal (1962)
- Rohtas Industries Ltd v Rohtas Industries Staff Union (1976)
- J.K. Industries Ltd v Chief Inspector of Factories and Boilers (1996)
- State of Rajasthan v Vidhyawati (1962)
- Sarla Mudgal, President, Kalyani v. Union of India (1995)
- Lily Thomas v. Union of India (2000)
- Saroj Rani v. Sudarshan Kumar (1984)
- Githa Hariharan v. Reserve Bank of India (1999)
- Sudeep Chaudhary v. Radha Chaudhary (1999)
- Jagannathan Pillai v. Kunjithapadam Pillai (1987)
- Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum (1985)
- Bhaurao Shankar Lokhande v. State of Maharashtra (1965)
- S. Nagalingam v. Sivagami (2001)
- Dr. Surajmani Stella Kujur v. Durga Charan Hansdah (2001)
- Babui Panmato Kuer v. Ram Agya Singh (1968)
- Asha Qureshi v. Afaq Qureshi (2002)
- P. v. K. (1982)
- Swaraj Garg v. K.M. Garg (1978)
- N.G. Dastane v. S. Dastane (1975)
- Samar Ghosh v. Jaya Ghosh (2007)
- In re Adoption of Payal @ Sharinee Vinay Pathak (2010)
- Bipinchandra Jaisinghbai Shah v. Prabhavati (1957)
- Dharmendra Kumar v. Usha Kumar (1977)
- T. Srinivasan v. T. Varalakshmi (1991 and 1999)
- Hirachand Srinivas Managaonkar v. Sunanda (2001)
- Sureshta Devi v. Om Prakash (1992)
- D. Velusamy v. D. Patchaiammal (2010)
- Amar Kanta Sen v. Sovana Sen (1960)
- Badshah v. Sou. Urmila Badshah Godse (2014)
- Mt. Ghulam Kubra Bibi v. Mohammad Shafi Mohammad Din (1940)
- Saiyid Rashid Ahmad v. Mt. Anisa Khatun (1932)
- Ghulam Sakina v. Falak Sher Allah Bakhsh (1950)
- A. Yousuf Rawther v. Sowramma (1971)
- Masroor Ahmed v. State (NCT of Delhi) (2008)
- Mrs. Sujata Sharma v. Shri Manu Gupta (2016)
- Ganduri Koteshwaramma v. Chakiri Yanadi (2011)
- Nirmala v. Government of NCT of Delhi (2010)
- Anversinh alias Kiransinh Fatesinh Zala v. State of Gujarat (2021)
- Court on its own motion (Lajja Devi) v. State (2012)
- Pinninti Venkataramana v. State (1977)
- Seema v. Ashwani Kumar (2006)
- Kanwar Pal Singh Gill v. State (Administration, Union Territory of Chandigarh) (2005)
- State of U.P. v. Chhoteylal (2011)
- Deepak Gulati v. State of Haryana (2013)
- Social Action Forum for Manav Adhikar v. Union of India (2018)
- State of Karnataka v. Basavegowda (1997)
- Independent Thought v. Union of India (2017)
- Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur (2017)
- Gyarsibai v. The State (1953)
- Revanasiddappa v. Mallikarjun (2011)